![]() |
| GitHub "brogrammers" censoring TOR. |
![]() |
| GitHub stupidity. Surprisingly "Create repository" still worked. |
Playing Insurgency, flexin my nuts, keeping it real.
![]() |
| Notepad++ Shortcut Mapper. |
![]() |
| Fuck Google. |
12 Jun 2015 01:27:00In 6.7.9 release, 2 context menus are added on status bar, sort lines features are enhanced, copy (to clipboard) in found results panel and find in files modal dialog are improved, and the new feature launch a new Notepad++ instance with administrator privilege to save the system protection file is added.21 Jun 2015 11:18:00A critical issue (hanging on exit) and a [IMS: begin strikethrough text] regression (JavaScript is not recognized in HTML document) [IMS: end strikethrough text] have has been fixed in 6.7.9.1 release.23 Jun 2015 00:31:43A regression (JavaScript is not recognized in HTML document) has been fixed in 6.7.9.2 release.
![]() |
| "Portable Chrome" from PortableApps.com |
![]() |
| Click-To-Play should be enabled by default, but Google is an advertisement company, so why would they enable Click-To-Play thus disabling Flash ads? |
![]() |
![]() |
| Fuck. |
![]() |
| Google Chrome Config Screen |
![]() |
| VLC config screen. |
http://search.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7439051&cid=49735255Tweets To Appear In Google Search Results
Re:OK, but seriously... (Score:0)
by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 20, 2015 @10:02AM (#49735255)
Google has been shooting themselves in the foot for years. Google search is already crap compared to how it used to be. The same for Gmail, YouTube, Sites and Groups.
I switched to Bing a couple of years ago and never looked back. Bing search results are better than Google, with *no advertising* and I get credit for every search I perform which I can later exchange for a reward, such as a gift card, or I can have Microsoft donate the money to a charity. I also switched to Outlook a while back and it's much faster, cleaner and better than Gmail.
Now if only Microsoft would hurry up and create their own video sharing service, I can finally dump YouTube.
![]() |
| Thanks Charlie Brooker! I'm gonna have to sit on my hands! |
![]() |
| FUCKING WINDOWS! Fucked up MBR (Master Boot Record) probably. |
15 Jan 2015 01:49:00
The Notepad++ official site was hacked on 12th January 2015, due to its controversial new version 6.7.4 "Je suis Charlie" edition, released on 10th January 2015. The site was restored on the same day.
The binaries of this edition are on another server and they are not compromised (the SHA1 published on 11th January 2015 is always available on SF). The automatic typing in Notepad++ "Je suis Charlie" edition after installation is a feature. Sorry for the panic.
The message of the defacement accused Notepad++ of inciting hatred towards Islam and accusing Islam of supporting terrorism. The statements of Notepad++ "Je suis Charlie" edition support nothing but the freedom of expression and only that. The fact of Notepad++ supporting the "Je suis Charlie" movement has nothing to do with any accusation towards a specific community. In fact the "Je suis Charlie" movement in France, as far as I can tell, deserves no label of racism or of Islamophobia. I have many Muslim friends who are for "Je suis Charlie". And sincerely, I don't think that two extremist fools can stand for all Muslims or Islam itself.
Regarding the "freedom of expression", I have read (from the social networks and your emails) that your most important argument is for "respect" and I'm all for respectful speech. The point of the message in the "Je suis Charlie" edition is that no one should be killed for any speech, even if disrespectful. This is the core concept of the Freedom of Speech. I believe everyone should agree with it.
If you don't like "Je suis Charlie" edition, that's fine. You can still use Notepad++ v6.7.3 - they are the same in terms of features and bug fixes.
notepad-plus-plus.org could be hacked over and over again, but I will always find a way to distribute Notepad++ "Je suis Charlie" edition - that's my freedom of expression which I claim as my right.
Free (or easily cracked ;) ).
Open-source.
Portable.
Cross-platform.
Customizable GUI (like Foobar2000).
Split views (if your text editor doesn't have split views, it is not a proper text editor)
Modules (like Notepad++)
Pretty icons.
Pretty text styles.
![]() |
| John Wick (2014) |
![]() |
| Chrome 25. Last good version of Google Chrome before it all went to shit. |
![]() |
| Can not use old Chrome version since Google blacklists them. |
![]() |
| VLC 2.2.0 "Default audio volume" missing. Fucking brogrammers! |
![]() |
| VLC 2.0.8 "Default audio volume" works. |
Also see:Stephen Horlander (Firefox "Australis")http://www.stephenhorlander.com/Sir Jony Ive (Apple) (belongs on this shitlist on principal)"Sir jony Ive Redesigns Things": http://jonyiveredesignsthings.tumblr.com/
Anti-Web-Design Manifesto
The modern web is abusive. Browsing a succession of sites is, on the surface, a visual assault hoisted on us by designers with goals often counter to our own interests; under the hood, it is a vector for behavioral tracking in the name of commerce or, worse, for untold nefarious deeds. The proliferation of tools that transform web pages for readability, on the one hand, and ad- and javascript-blockers on the other point to a general dissatisfaction with the status quo.
We face jarring and questionable changes in layout and color schemes. Fonts change from page to page and introduce custom, one-off glyphs. The text we read is sandwiched by menus, ads and links to more "content." We suffer audio and video that start on their own. We are required to use proprietary, security-hole-ridden plugins. Meanwhile, in the background, countless scripts fetched from countless unrelated domains waste CPU cycles.
The more action one takes against these problems, the more broken the web becomes. Unfortunately, web designers have grown dependent on such behavior, while site owners are concerned more about their site's advertising revenue than their visitors' desires. With regards to visual design, the fact is that any individual has a far better idea of what constitutes comfortable-to-read text for them than a designer could. A designer either designing for his or her own tastes or trying to find some best-of-all-worlds design will ultimately fail to satisfy the vast majority of visitors to the site. Instead, we have begrudgingly grown accustomed to a completely heterogeneous web. As for advertising and behavioral tracking, no one should have to suffer that.
Here are ten maxims to which to adhere when building a new web site. Sticking to all ten of these will help restore some sanity to the world. As a quick and easy test to see how badly your site is broken, load it in a minimal web browser, such as Dillo with both remote CSS and embedded CSS disabled. Prepare to cringe.
1) Completely override-able CSS If your website cannot be viewed properly with a custom user CSS file, it is broken. Over-dependence on div tags to get the site to look exactly the way you want it is guaranteed to make it difficult to read for some of your visitors. Designers, it may come as a surprise to you, but not everyone loves your work. Many people use custom CSS files to force a style that is easy on their eyes. Yet, a surprising number of sites fail to render properly if their CSS is overridden. In my perfect world, no websites would provide CSS files; all styling would be done by the user. Of course, since most people do not use their own stylesheets, everyone would complain about how horrible all these plain black-and-white sites look. So at a minimum, your CSS should be minimal, such that overriding it causes little disruption to the flow of your site.
2) No client-side scripts If your website cannot be viewed properly with Javascript disabled, it is broken. There is absolutely no reason that your website should run a script on the visitor's computer, especially if the user cannot view the full source somewhere. No one is to be trusted online, not even you. For a normal, text-displaying website, using scripts is completely unnecessary since you can just store the text in an HTML document. That's what HTML is for. If you are trying to make a web application, just stop. Build a native application. It's nicer for everyone.
3) No proprietary plugins If your website requires the installation of a proprietary plugin, it is broken. The endless stream of news about security holes found in proprietary plugins like Java and Flash should be an immediate hint to you that you shouldn't be using them. The fact that they're proprietary means that we cannot benefit from the careful eye of other developers who can spot such flaws. Not only that but support for such software is limited only to what the company that produces it chooses to support, potentially leaving many visitors out. It is not safe to assume that everyone who visits your site can even run such plugins, due to said lack of support or due to lack of computing resources (not everyone in the world can afford a fast computer).
4) No advertising This is a touchy point but words will not be minced. Advertising is manipulative and obtrusive. Most people do not need to buy anything in particular at any given moment and they even less likely need to buy whatever is being advertised to them at that time. Further damning is that advertising is a common source of malicious content on the web, in the form of tracking cookies and cross-site scripting. Cramming advertising into your site in order to generate some kind of income is lazy at best. Some will argue that, since sites depend on advertising revenue to survive, then somehow blocking ads is immoral. It is simple: if your business model is simply to attach some "content" to advertising space, your business deserves to fail. Honestly, it will be no big loss to have such sites go out of business. The world does not need so many vapid link aggregating sites, press-release-rehashing review sites, or echo-chamber journalism sites. If you really must host advertisements, be respectful of your visitors. Host the ads on your own server; do not fetch them remotely. Do not use moving images, pop-ups, audio, video, "click-through" links, or anything else that serves to distract the visitor from what they actually came to your site to see.
5) No frames, multi-columns or other visual clutter If your main text is drowned out by the surrounding content, your site is broken. Trying to read an article when the text is crammed between navigation menus, advertisements, links to more articles, link-sharing widgets, blogrolls, and whatever other things you squeeze into your site to try to keep the visitors attention is an absolute pain. If your site were well-organized to begin with, none of these would be necessary. In fact, such layouts are absurd in that your site is competing with itself for the reader's attention! One single column of text is the most comfortable reading experience you can give your visitor. As for all that other junk, simply make your site well-organized enough for it to be easily discoverable without having to shove it in the visitor's face.
6) No non-standard fonts If your website absolutely depends on a particular font, it is broken. Fonts are subtle, in that most people probably do not pay much attention to which one is in use. That said, some people are absolute fanatics about fonts. Most web browsers allow the user to force the usage of their favorite one. Normally this is not a problem. However, increasingly websites are starting to use custom fonts with special glyphs that serve as icons on the site, presumably for bandwidth reasons (see Github project pages, for example). This completely subverts the user's right to select his or her own, preferred font. As in the above case of CSS, never presume that you have a better idea of what your visitor wants to see. If they do have a better idea, then you should not thwart their ability to implement it for themselves.
7) No tracking If your website leaks private information of your visitors to anyone, it is broken. This should go without question. You have no right to perform any behavioral metrics on your visitors. Their right to privacy should be paramount. Your revenue streams are irrelevant to them. Even more egregious is to allow third parties to do the tracking on your site and worse yet if it is done without any notification to the user. Nobody wants their every move tracked, be it in the web or in the real world. Respect your visitors' privacy and do not do any form of tracking. A word about cookies: unless you are providing a service that requires user log-in, you do not need to send them. Period.
8) No unnecessary pagination If your website cannot fit a normal-length article on one page, it is broken. Web browsers, unlike books, have this amazing ability to scroll. Unless you are presenting a genuinely long document, you should not need pagination (though, clearly for very long documents, some pagination is desirable to easily mark one's place). Nevertheless, these days many sites unnecessarily break relatively short articles into several pages. This is tightly coupled to advertising: the more pages the visitor has to visit to read the article, the more ads can be presented. With no advertising, as suggested above, this problem would disappear.
9) No abusive account requirements Many websites require accounts these days, for example to participate in some social aspect like a forum or comments, or to accommodate paying subscriber fees. This is fine. What is not fine is how much information is often required to subscribe. Under very few circumstances do you actually need the visitor's email address. Real names and mailing addresses are likely only necessary for online payment, which should be held quite separately from normal user information. In any case, if a login is required, take the absolute minimum of necessary information, ideally only a login name and a password.
10) No new annoyances The web is a swiftly changing thing and there is no way this paltry list can cover all the corner cases or future annoyances. Before you implement anything, know that we probably neither need it nor want it. Please spare us from having yet another thing to curse about. Remember, all we want to do is read what you have to say. Anything else is just in the way.
![]() |
| The Wire Season 01. |
![]() |
| Breaking Bad S03E13. HK Mark 23. |
![]() |
| A wee bit higher Mike. |
Copyright © 2010 Insurgency Mod Scum
Blogger Templates by Splashy Templates. PSD Design by insicdesigns