[PROTIP][NOTED] Deleting All Previous Commits in Git

Source:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9683279/make-the-current-commit-the-only-initial-commit-in-a-git-repository

git checkout --orphan newBranch
git add -A  # Add all files and commit them
git commit
git branch -D master  # Deletes the master branch
git branch -m master  # Rename the current branch to master

[PROTIP][NOTED] Record Multiple Screen Areas at the Same Time (Open Broadcater Software and ShareX)

Update: Both ShareX and OBS are not able to stop and resume recording :(.

You want to video record two things on your screen at the same time. Use multiple instances of Open Broadcaster Software or ShareX (both are open source).

RunOBS.bat
start /b %CD%\OBS.exe -portable -multi

RunShareX.bat
start /b %CD%\sharex.exe -multi -portable

BTW, do not use XSplit, it looks like a scam.

[NOTED] "wdhash" Total Commander Plugin Calculates MD5 Incorrectly!

[NOTED] How to fight terrorism

Also see:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/07/noted-on-leaving-facebook-thing-about.html

Source:
http://qntm.org/terrorism

As an ordinary human being, you may feel that there is nothing you can do in the fight against terrorism. You couldn't be more wrong.

You see, terrorism directly targets ordinary people. You, an ordinary person, can deny terrorists their victory simply by refusing to be a victim. Believe it or not, you have a choice in the matter. This is because the victims of terrorism are not simply those who get blown up during the initial attack. It's the people who are scared to fly in airplanes or visit big cities afterwards. It's the people who get dragged into a war against an abstract concept. It's the people who get attacked in the street because they look like they might come from a hot country.

I live in England. On July 7, 2005, our capital city was bombed. This was our reaction. Read it. Read it all, and learn. The attack failed. Terrorist attacks can fail, despite the body count, simply because of human spirit. And once terrorism ceases to be effective, terrorism will cease.

Here is how you, an ordinary human being, can fight terrorism:

Ignore it.

The more you think about a threat, the larger it grows in your mind. The more you talk about it, the more worried you and people around you become. So quit talking about terrorism. Quit seeking out horror stories in news shows and on the internet. The media's job is to sensationalise things to get you to watch them. That's how they get ratings and they are very, very good at it. Don't get dragged in by these ploys. Turn off the sensationalist television. Be informed, yes, but don't stand for any of that alarmism, speculation, bias, uncertainty and denial.

Instead:

Know the facts. There is no risk.

The odds against you being killed in a terrorist attack are millions to one. Ditto plane crashes. Only somebody who regularly enters lottery draws would be put off by odds like these. You have more chance of dying in a car crash tomorrow, and do you fret about that? Hell no.

Understanding this will enable you to:

Show no fear.

Terrorism, by its very definition, sets out to provoke terror. If you are scared afterwards, the act of terrorism was successful. If you refuse to be intimidated, the terrorists have lost. It really is as simple as that. You are not a mindless animal. You can choose not to give in to your basic impulses. Show some backbone.

Don't be provoked.

Don't get irrationally angry against the entire country that the terrorists originate from. Don't start to take out that anger on nearby people who look like they might be from that country. And don't accept a similar reaction from your leaders. The reason? Hate breeds terrorism. If you attack people, you give them motivation to retaliate. And if you hit back harder then they'll hit back harder still. It's a cycle of aggression which only you can break.

As the attacked party, you're supposed to be the good guy here: act like it. Back down. Walk away. Be the bigger man.

Stay free.

Refuse to let your civil liberties be restricted. Benjamin Franklin said that "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." But you won't even get safety, just the illusion of safety. Security cameras on subways won't stop terrorism. Compulsory ID cards won't stop terrorism. Suicide bombers don't care if they get identified. There are better ways to fight terrorism and, as I said above, there are more people to protect from its effects than just those caught in the blast radius. Don't stand for it.

Refuse to alter your lifestyle in any way.

That sums the whole thing up. Bury your dead. Heal your wounded. Rebuild stronger. Go the hell back to work the next morning.

[NOTED] On leaving Facebook & The Thing About Facebook

Also see:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.nl/2015/07/noted-how-to-fight-terrorism.html

Source:
http://qntm.org/facebook

I began by removing from my list of Facebook friends people who persistently declared themselves to be fans of asinine, obvious things, like "sleep".

No, quite frankly, I do not wish to know that you appreciate Saturdays, toast, or Kramer from "Seinfeld". This does not improve my opinion of you. In fact, I hardly have any opinion of you other than what I see you doing on Facebook! I haven't seen you since primary school! If, indeed, I've ever even met you!

Some people find this stuff as annoying as I do and simply ignore it all, but then some people don't use Adblock because they can put up with moving objects in their peripheral vision all day every day. As for me, I find "unfriend" to be the most effective ignore. Don't get me wrong. I'm still pro-toast. Toaist, if you will. But I don't need Facebook to express that, nor (due to nagging security concerns and the simple fact that Facebook is their site, not mine) is Facebook the medium I want to use to express that. So eventually I gave up and I left entirely.

It feels like sites like Facebook channel all of our free expression into neat, pre-moulded boxes. "Susie is a fan of writing!" "Ed is in love with Tina!" Dang it, show us the writing! Show us the love! It's like it's become impossible to express any relationship below "friend", and it's impossible to express any feeling below "is a fan of". It's like talking using corporation-manufactured language, in which all we can do is proclaim our fondness for a product, or else keep silent. It reduces everything to a binary love/don't love choice. Personality tests? Great! Answer all these questions, and we will tell you that you, like all humans, fall into one of these eight categories of people! Isn't that INFORMATIVE? Didn't you learn something?

And Twitter? One hundred and forty characters is not, and should not be, enough to express yourself. These days it seems like brevity equates with legitimacy, because if you can summarise your opinion in fewer syllables than your opponent then you can repeat your message more times in a given space, which means people are more swayed, and you can fit your message into smaller commercial spaces, which means more people will bother to read it. Truly important and meaningful statements are big thoughts with great nuance and irreducible complexity, becoming meaningless if interrupted halfway. Arguments cannot be easily dissected into two opposing viewpoints. You are not a) wholly right or b) wholly wrong.

You will not be able to stay home, blogger.

You will not be able to dial up, log in and cop out.

You will not be able to watch the revolution unfold on your RSS feed because the revolution will not be tweeted.

The revolution will not be tweeted; the revolution will not cost ninety-nine cents from iTunes; the revolution will not appear on Fark, Digg, Reddit or Metafilter, nor be brought to you by Randall Munroe, Ben Croshaw, Jack Thompson, Ron Paul or Stephen Colbert. The revolution will not be tagged "nsfw" or locked for editing by newly-registered users due to persistent vandalism.

The revolution will not have rounded corners because the revolution will not be tweeted.

[NOTED] The Thing About Facebook

Source:
http://qntm.org/thing

So here's the thing about Facebook (which I left some time ago).

It's 2010. All information is viral. Not in the good way, "This will catch on fast! Alternate reality games! Memes in the misinterpreted sense!", in a "contagious infection that you can't stop from spreading" way.

Let's say I make a profile for myself online and I choose to share its most sordid details only with my very closest friends. Firstly, my closest friends are distinct people. They have their own rights, profiles and security settings. They can share anything they wish with anybody they wish. Even if they choose to only share the data with their closest friends, this is not an idempotent operation. Applied sufficiently many times, everybody is a closest friend of a closest friend of [...] a closest friend of everybody else who uses Facebook or not, including my friends, mother, shareholders, boss and wife. In addition, there is the company who hosts my profile. Do they have the right to share my data? Well, I gave it to them voluntarily. And I click "Yes" every time their EULA changes.

What else are they going to do with it? Hosting and accumulating data is all Facebook does.

Facebook has not gone rogue or turned evil. It has abandoned pretence.

Facebook is not a charity. Why does it host ridiculous polls and let you say "I Like It"? Why does it track your personal information and shopping habits and responses to advertisements and potentially every other action you take? Because the accumulation and sale of demographic data - about YOU, its users - is its primary business model. Maybe there were a few noble idealistic months at the beginning of the site's existence when it truly was there to make people happy and nothing else, but now it has hosting costs beyond your wildest nightmares, which must be covered somehow. This - user data, and advertising targeted with pinpoint accuracy - was always the only way that the site was ever going to turn a profit. To assume otherwise is naïve, and to think that an open-source alternative will solve this problem doubly so.

It is not practical - in fact, it's practically oxymoronic - for a social networking site to keep data private, and it is dishonest for a social networking site to pretend that it can keep your data private while continuing to cover operating costs. Zuckerberg made remarks some months ago about wishing Facebook had never had privacy controls, and was lambasted for it. I'm dubious of his motives, but I call his conclusions pragmatic and justifiable. Dear user: Keep your information to yourself, or share it with the entire listening universe, corporations included. There is no longer a middle ground. This is not a relaxation of privacy controls. This is an increasingly bare-faced confession of underlying principles. We're in a world where personal information is free-as-in-speech but valuable-as-in-beer.

Social networking has been like this since it began, and it will be like this until long after you die. This Is The Way The World Is Going To Work Now. The more plain the sites' intentions are, and the more consumers understand about how the net is going to work going forward, the better. Knowing this is good for you. You may decide this is fine, and that's fine, or not, and that's fine too. The important thing is that your decision is informed.

[NOTED] Chromium (Chrome) chrome://flags

Source:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=rFFVK0H1

Enter following into address bar and go: chrome://flags/

- you can also use Ctrl + F to search for specific entriess

Enable the following for improved performance:

==============================================

Enable fast tab/window close

Enable Download Resumption

Enable GPU rasterization

Enable SPDY/4

Enable experimental canvas features

Enable the stale-while-revalidate cache directive

Enable the experimental SurfaceWorker feature

Enable scroll prediction

Overlay Scrollbars (IMS: DISABLE THIS SHIT)

Device Discovery Notifications (Disable)

Number of raster threads = 4

Fill passwords on account selection = Enable with field highlighting (IMS: NO)

GPU rasterization MSAA sample count = 16

Maximum tiles for interest area = 512

Enable Show Saved Copy Button = Enable: Primary

Touchscreen Haters:

===================

Disable: Enable touch initiated drag and drop

Disable: Enable touch based text editing

Disable: Enable touch events

PRIVACY TWEAKS (IMS: in chrome://settings):

===============

* Enable: Disable hyperlink auditing (IMS: chrome://flags)

* Disable: Use a web service to help resolve navigation errors

* Disable: Use a prediction service to help complete searches and URLs

* Disable: Prefetch resources to load pages more quickly

* Disable: Automatically report details of possible security incidents to Google

* Disable: Enable phishing and malware protection

* Disable: Send a "Do Not Track" request with your browsing traffic

Also see:

http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/linknoted-chromium-chrome-privacy.html

http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/03/rant-brogrammers-and-brosigners-dumbing.html

http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2012/08/verticaltree-style-tabs-and-other-must.html

[LINK][NOTED] Chromium (Chrome) Privacy Settings Explained

Source:
http://newsblog.wti.com/index.php/2013/11/how-to-disable-privacy-sensitive-features-in-google-chrome/

[NOTED][PROTIP] Start & Stop Windows 7 Services As Administrator via Batch File

Source:
Enable Disable Built In Administrator Acount
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd744293(v=ws.10).aspx

net user administrator /active:yes

Control Panel -> Users

Create password for Administrator.

EverythingServiceStart.bat

runas /user:administrator /savecred "cmd /c net start Everything & timeout 3" 

start /b %cd%\everything\everything.exe

EverythingServiceStop.bat

::runas.exe /user:administrator /savecred "cmd /c net stop Everything & timeout 3"

::runas.exe /user:administrator /savecred "cmd /c taskkill /f /im everything.exe & timeout 3"

runas.exe /user:administrator /savecred "cmd /c net stop Everything & timeout 3 & taskkill /f /im everything.exe & timeout 3"

RTFM:

net

http://ss64.com/nt/net_service.html

start

http://ss64.com/nt/start.html

timeout

http://www.robvanderwoude.com/wait.php

taskkill

http://ss64.com/nt/taskkill.html

Source:

https://htipe.wordpress.com/2009/07/19/multiple-commands-on-a-single-windows-command-line/

When using cmd.exe, you can put multiple commands on the same line by using ‘&’ or ‘&&’ between commands. Using a single ampersand (&) will cause the first command and then the second command to be run in sequence. Using double ampersands (&&) introduces error checking. The second command will run only if the first command is successful.

[PROTIP][NOTED] Classic Shell Custom Commands

Unfortunately there's no info on "groupby <property>" :(

Also see:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/linknoted-classic-shell-opening-windows.html

[LINK][NOTED] Classic Shell: Opening Windows "Special" Folders

http://www.classicshell.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4043
http://docs.rainmeter.net/tips/launching-windows-special-folders
http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/110919-clsid-key-list-windows-7-a.html

ALSO SEE:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/protipnoted-classic-shell-custom.html

[FILM] The Gunman Weapons & Tactics Credits

Also see:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/film-gunman-2015.html

BTW IMDB for some reason does not list the entire credits for this film.

Fight Choreographer

Markos Rounthwaite

Armourer

Juan Ramon Molina

Armourer Assistant

Antonion Molina

Armourer to Mr Penn

Cesar Abades

Armourer UK

Nick Jeffries

Armourers Dailies

Damian Mitchell

Adam Goodall

Armoury SA

Brian Wentzel

Armoury

Molina Armas S.L.

Military Costume Design Assistant

Nathaniel Turner

Military Advisors

Sir Billy Billingham

Christopher Sargeant

Krav Maga Trainers

Michael Margolin

Wayne Miller

Police Advisor

Rafael Navea Moreno

Creative Consultant

Jim Thompson

Personal Trainer to Mr Penn

Ray Kybartas

Curiously Mr Elba requires *two* hair stylists ;) :

Paul Job

Brett Mayo

[NOTED] Cmder Tips

*
"Cmdr Here" Right Mouse Click:

cmder.exe /REGISTER ALL

*

"Cmder" Button in Total Commander

Total Commander: "Cmdr Here" via Cmdr Button Bar Button:

In Total Commander "Change Button Bar":

Paramaters: %p%

Source (what a shitty writer BTW): http://www.kodermac.com/cmder-in-totalcommander/

ALSO SEE:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.de/2015/06/protip-fix-lambda-command-prompt-in.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.de/2015/06/protipnoted-kill-windows-10-advert-spam.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.de/2015/05/tools-portable-windows-console-conemu.html

[NOTED] Chromium (Chrome) Config: Extensions

2015.06.29

Blank NTP
Moment
Personal Blocklist
ScriptSafe
TamperMonkey
uBlock
Video Downloader

ALSO SEE:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/noted-ublock-config.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/noted-tampermonkey-config.html

[NOTED] uBlock Config

2015.06.29

Ads (3)

 Adblock Warning Removal List‎ : 79 used out of 83purge cache

 Anti-Adblock Killer | Reek‎  (raw.githubusercontent.com): 4,017 used out of 4,130purge cache

 Peter Lowe’s Ad server list‎ (yoyo.org): 1,573 used out of 2,416purge cache

Malware domains (4)

 Malware Domain List‎ (malwaredomainlist.com): 1,429 used out of 1,429purge cache

 Malware domains‎ : 9,511 used out of 9,740purge cache

 Malware domains (long-lived)‎ : 0 used out of 3,450purge cache

 Spam404‎ (spam404bl.com): 5,161 used out of 5,165purge cache

 Social (1)

 Anti-ThirdpartySocial (see warning inside list)‎  (fanboy.co.nz): 58 used out of 78purge cache

Multipurpose (4)

 Dan Pollock’s hosts file‎ (someonewhocares.org): 8,927 used out of 10,906purge cache

 Fanboy+Easylist-Merged Ultimate List‎  (fanboy.co.nz): 91,056 used out of 91,128purge cache

 hpHosts’s Ad and tracking servers‎ (hosts-file.net): 38,464 used out of 44,897purge cache

 MVPS HOSTS‎ (mvps.org): 13,284 used out of 13,658purge cache

Custom (3)

 Fanboy's Anti-thirdparty Fonts‎ : 39 used out of 39purge cache

 Youtube: Pure Video Experience‎ : 19 used out of 19purge cache

ALSO SEE:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/noted-tampermonkey-config.html

[NOTED] TamperMonkey Config

Installed userscripts

[TS] Schmoogle
Disable audio/video autoplay
HTML5 video auto-pause
Pause all HTML5 videos on load
YouTube HTML5 AutoPause
Youtube Html5 Disable
YouTube Links
YouTube Stop HTML5 Video Autoplay 2...

ALSO SEE:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/04/pro-tip-anti-html5-greasemonkey.html

[PROTIP][NOTED][BUG] "Chromium requires Windows... or later. This PC is running Windows..."

Source:
http://portableapps.com/node/15570

Fix:

%USERPROFILE%\AppData\Local\Temp

Folder Properties->Security->Edit->"Everyone"->"Allow" "Full Control"

[PROTIP] [NOTED] Hosts List Blacklists

2015.07.05

OK

"MVPS"
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.txt

"Peter Lowe"
http://pgl.yoyo.org/as/serverlist.php?hostformat=hosts&showintro=1&mimetype=plaintext

"hpHosts"
http://hosts-file.net/ad_servers.txt

"Malware Domain List"
http://www.malwaredomainlist.com/hostslist/hosts.txt

"Cameleon"
http://sysctl.org/cameleon/hosts.win

"Dan Pollock"
http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/hosts

DO NOT USE

"hpHosts"
http://hosts-file.net/download/hosts.txt

[SLASHDOT][QUOTES] AdBlock Plus Successful Scam

ALSO SEE:

http://insurgencymod.blogspot.de/2015/06/slashdotquoteadblock-plus-vs-adblock-vs.html

RE "AdBlock Plus"
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2014/12/pro-tip-microblock-adblock-like-chrome.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2013/03/pro-tip-firefox-adblock-without.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2013/02/pro-tip-block-ads-like-pro-checklist.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2012/11/pro-tip-rogue-browser-extensions.html

RE uBlock
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/rantprotip-ublock-origin-vs-ublock.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/noted-ublock-config.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/04/protip-what-happed-to-ublock-aka.html

Source:
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7570271&cid=49940893

Re:This is about "Adblock Plus" not "AdBlock" (Score:2)

by xenoc_1 (140817) on Thursday June 18, 2015 @07:38PM (#49940893) 

And I say unto thee, "RTFP". I explicitly noted that with this: "has that feature turned on by default, so most non-techies see ads from Eyeo customers."

Wherein I made clear that most non-technical users, which are not most of us Slashdot members, will leave it as-is. Implied, and from years of experience with non-technical users, because non-techies don't know/don't understand how/are afraid, to change anything from "normal".

Which means that Eyeo, Inc. continues to create a big user base of "pay for play" payola opportunities to sell to Google, Amazon, and other ad networks. And indeed they do sell the right to be listed as "Acceptable Ads" - it's right on their website, buried in weasel-words but there, and it's been in plenty of news articles about them. You do the DuckBingGoogle if you want cites of sites. Yes, the small guys, like my blog or yours, can probably get listed as "Acceptable" for free, and Eyeo will have a big public discussion on each and every one of those on their site, because, "transparency". But the details of the huge moneyflows from Google et al will not be there.

Here's the thing: Ad blockers are not default in any browser nor as part of any operating system. Which means that anyone who installs an ad blocker has already made an affirmative choice to block ads. That means it's contrary to common sense and clearly against the desire of the user, for any "ad blocker" to have a default setting that deliberately allows ads - ANY ads.

Unless, of course, the "user" AKA "the customer" is NOT the person who installs the adblocker. Unless that person is the product. And for Eyeo, the person using Adblock Plus is no longer the user/customer, they are the "product" - the eyeballs being sold to their real customer, the companies that pay Eyeo to be part of the "Acceptable Ads" program.

It's not "you can just turn it off". It's how the very concept of a partially non-blocking adblocker, and a very non-transparent financial arrangement between Eeyo and "BigAdNetworks", is inherently contrary to the baseline concept and user case for an adblocker.

Obviously I didn't need somebody to lecture me about the existing of Adblock Edge, or the ABP checkbox, or the other various adblocking options, when I put references to such things right in my post.

And for the record, in the years of using Adblock Edge, its brief predecessor Adblock Light, the pre-Acceptable Ads Adblock Plus, and since this month, uBlock and now after reflection on their ethics, uBlock Origin instead, I have and continue to un-block many sites, specific third-party networks, major affiliate-link trackers such as Amazon Associates, Commission Junction, Shareasale, Linkshare, etc., so that small webmasters and some large websites who aren't eyebleed-inducing, can get some potential monetization from my use. I even sometimes go back to look for and click through an ad of specific interest, or via a site's affiliate link, to a product/service I'm considering buying. I also run a few affiliate link ads on some of my own sites - and make sure I do nothing to force people to unblock them. In fact, I suggest adblockers and privacy blockers right in the privacy policy on my sites.

Difference between that and the skeevy policies of Adblock Plus/Eyeo: Transparency and full choice. Choice on my part as to ads I want to see, choice on visitors to my sites on how they can not see ads and not get into my analytics. No pay-for-play, no whitelisting decisions made for somebody else.

Anybody who can't see the difference is either a) brainwashed, b) a sockpuppet for the ad industry, c) a sockpuppet for Eyeo/Adblock Plus (which really is part of the ad industry at this point), or d) naïve.

Ghostery, Inc is totally open and fully upfront about their connection to the advertising industry. And their not-quite-equivalent feature is OPT-IN, rather than OPT-OUT.

AdBlock (Chrome) as far as I know was never really Open Source - it was one-time-nag (install-time) donationware but not with a "libre" license. I may misremember that. They have an OPT-IN for "I like that text ads on Google search, let me see them" and I always opt-IN. Because, it's MY proactive affirmative choice. Just like Ghostery's OPT-IN to GhostRank, which I ignore and it defaults to the most-private setting.

Ghostery does not block anything by default, but they are clear about it, and the whole idea is to choose what to block.

There's nothing unethical about what either Ghostery or AdBlock are doing. There is plenty unethical and contrary-to-concept of what Eyeo/Adblock Plus is doing. And there's possible something sketchy about what uBlock is doing, which is why I have switched to the original creator's uBlock Origin.

[SLASHDOT][QUOTE]AdBlock Plus vs AdBlock vs adblock vs adblocker

Source:
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7570271&cid=49938465

ALSO SEE:

http://insurgencymod.blogspot.de/2015/06/slashdotquotes-adblock-plus-successful.html

RE "AdBlock Plus"
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2014/12/pro-tip-microblock-adblock-like-chrome.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2013/03/pro-tip-firefox-adblock-without.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2013/02/pro-tip-block-ads-like-pro-checklist.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2012/11/pro-tip-rogue-browser-extensions.html

RE uBlock
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/rantprotip-ublock-origin-vs-ublock.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/06/noted-ublock-config.html
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2015/04/protip-what-happed-to-ublock-aka.html

This is about "Adblock Plus" not "AdBlock" (Score:5, Informative)

by xenoc_1 (140817) on Thursday June 18, 2015 @02:32PM (#49938465) 

Seriously folks, pay some attention to the name of the product and what it means. It's stuff that matters.

"AdBlock": A Chrome, and later other platform, ad blocking extension that has nothing whatsoever to do with "Adblock Plus" either in terms of codebase or project history.

"Adblock Plus" (note no MixedCase): The increasingly-monetizing adblocker which is owned and marketed by for-profit company Eyeo, that Wladimir Palant created to make money with the open source adblocker he took over as maintainer years ago, but did not create. The one that takes money from advertisers to whitelist so-called "Acceptable Ads" and has that feature turned on by default, so most non-techies see ads from Eyeo customers.

"adblock": Not a product at all but a generic term for an advertising, and sometimes also privacy, blocking extension for browsers. There are many competing products which might be generically called "adblock".

"adblocker" A more obviously generic term for the set of "adblocker" products that include, among many others, AdBlock, Adblock Plus, Adblock Edge, Bluhell Firewall, uBlock, uBlock Origin.

"Adblock" One of, if not the, earliest adblocking extensions for Firefox. Long obsolete, it was the inspiration for, and partially the codebase for the first version, of Adblock Plus. The maintainer of AdBlock (note the MixedCase) also claims Adblock is an inspiration for AdBlock but is no part of its codebase.

The article is about only Adblock Plusâ from Eyeo Inc. Which has the most commercialized, most cooperative with advertisers, and some including me would say, most skeevy business model of any of the major adblocker. Though the drama around the creator of uBlock forking it to "uBlock Origin" and the massively overlarge donation-begging by the new uBlock owners are some evidence that new-uBlock is pretty skeevy too. Which is why this tablet has uBlock Origin running in Firefox.

[LINKS][NOTED] Adobe Direct Downloads

CS6
https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cs6-product-downloads.html

Adobe CC 2014
http://onhax.net/cc-2014-download/

Adobe CC 2015
http://prodesigntools.com/adobe-cc-2015-direct-download-links.html

ALSO SEE:
http://insurgencymod.blogspot.com/2013/01/photoshop-cs6-extended-1301-spam-free.html